## Stan Meyer EPG Gas to Power Electric Particle Generator

Now consider the work with magnetic liquids in California where a drop of magnetic liquid moving through

a coil

3 .questions Are the magnetic droplets acting like the neodymium battery train ( homopolar magnet)

and if the copper coil is made into a circular loop and pickup coils placed around the

"track" ( as in the multitier epg) is useful power obtained from the permanently magnetized droplets

comments?

it is our belief that Stans Work has been keep secret and being slowly handed out to universities to keep them showing something

I deleted my post regard ElectroStatic Pulsing over Magnetic Pulsing.

After reviewing the thread below...

/showthread.php?tid=400&pid=4658#pid4658

I understand now that using magnetics is the ideal mode of use of the EPG, but requires the Argon/Cobalt/Nickel, magnetically polarized gas matrix.

I also, reviewed the "House meeting in New Zealand" video where Stan talks about the EPG and the magnetized gas.

I thought for sure that Stan talks about water propulsion on some video...

Maybe I just mis-understood what he was talking about...

...

Just reviewed the 3rd video of the "House meeting in New Zealand", where he covers the fact that when using laser light within the EPG (He does this to increase the mass of the atomic gas matrix), then, you no-longer need to motivate the gas, because it's the shock wave of the light itself that causes the electrical field generation (which is then caught by the pickup coils), as the electrons move away from the atomic nucleus, which then results is a higher magnetic energy in the gas. Thus, powering all of New Zealand with a single EPG, and entering the relm of OU.

Fascinating...

Now, back to the Magnetic Gas Lattice...

Argon (Lubricator, Non Electric, Non Magnetic)

Cobalt Ions

Nickel Ions

Cobalt Ions

Co^2+, Co^3+

Generate using HV to a pure Cobalt wire.

Nickel Ions

Ni^2+, Ni^3+

Generate using HV to a pure Nickel wire.

Iron Ions

Fe^2+, Fe^3+

Generate using HV to a pure Nickel wire.

Generate Cobalt and Nickel Ions using HV within an Argon filled chamber.

- Pass Gas Mixture through VIC and expose to laser energy.

- This destabilizes the Atomic Structures of the main elements in the Gas. So that that we can extract some electrons from them.

- Use electron extraction circuit to remove extra electrons. Now our atoms will be will to take on covalent bonds that they would normally never take on.

- Allow Unstable Gas to stabilize into the new Gas Matrix by making new covalent bonds.

Pump gases into EPG.

Test EPG for appropriate Magnetic Qualities of the Gas Lattice.

- Does pulsing it result in some energy output from the pickup coils?

Damn! That boy was Brilliant!

- Not just theory, but applied science.

- Mechanics, Electronics, Chemistry, Nuclear Physics...

- Amazing stuff!

-Dogs

The Purpose of these pages is for your to quickly see learn and advance further on replicating Stan Meyers to Assist us getting this open source to market

As you experiment share your picture and video on you tube

As a Team we advance fast

the dates on this aprox 2005

and than 2012 there was alot of work done

than recently 2016 , Years are passing we need people working on this

Not all of the early EPG models of Stanley Meyer's devices used mechanical pumps to move

magnetic slurry or gas within the copper spiral cores. One model used linear magnetic drive

pumps to circulate the slurry/gases. The other was the magnetic spin EPG. The six tier multiple

tier EPG (aka "gega series" or (6Tmaggasepg) designed for home power generation also had

similar pumps. The seven tier system is now thought to have had a bottom tier with electronics

for control of the flow of the magnetic gas but not pickup coils

see attached 2 new images of the EPGs

1. Magnetic Spin EPG

2 Magnetic Drive EPG

3 Example Linear Mag Drive

INDEX TO WFC MEMO 418

COVER

COVER SHEET

PREFACE ELECTRICAL PARTICLE GENERATOR

VOLTAGE INTENSIFIER CIRCUIT AA … … PAGE1

OPERATIONAL PARAMETERS …… PAGE 2

VARIABLE AMPLITUDE UNIPOLAR PULSE … … PAGE 3

APPLIED VOLTAGE TO PLATES … … PAGE 4

LC VOLTAGE .… .. PAGE 5

VIC RESISTANCE DUAL-INLINE RLC NETWORK . ….. PAGE 6

VOLTAGE DYNAMIC .… … PAGE 7

VOLTAGE CALCULATIONS … …. PAGE 8

ATOMIC INTERACTION TO VOLTAGE STIMULATION … … PAGE 9

VOLTAGE STIMULATION OF GAS ATOM … .… PAGE 10

LASER INTERACTION ..… … PAGE 11

GAS RESONANT CAVITY … …… PAGE 12

ELECTRON EXTRACTION PROCESS … ……PAGE 13

ATOMIC BONDING OF UNLIKE ATOMS … ……PAGE 14

MAGNETIC GAS LATTICE …… … PAGE 15

ELECTROMAGNETIC ENHANCEMENT …… … PAGE 16

OPERATIONAL PARAMETERS ...… … PAGE 17

APPENDIX .

INDEX TO FIGURES FIGURE 1-1 VOLTAGE INTENSIFIER CIRCUIT (AA) PAGE 1

FIGURE 1-2 LC CIRCUIT SCHEMATIC PAGE 2

FIGURE 9B VARIABLE AMPLITUDE UNIPOLAR PULSE VOLTAGE PAGE 3

VOLTAGE FREQUENCY SUPER IMPOSED ONTO A 50% DUTY CYCLE PULSE TRAIN

FIGURE 9BB. APPLIED VOLTAGE TO PLATES PAGE 4

FIGURE 1-3. VOLTAGE POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE PAGE 7

FIGURE 1-5. GAS DESTABILIZATION PROCESS PAGE 10

FIGURE 1-6. LED CLUSTER ARRAY PAGE 11

FIGURE 20 JX GAS RESONANT CAVITY PAGE 12

FIGURE 1-7. ELECTRON EXTRACTION CIRCUIT PAGE 13

FIGURE 1-8. COVALENT LINKUP OF UNLIKE ATOMS PAGE 14

FIGURE 1-9. MAGNETIZED GAS LATTICE PAGE 15

FIGURE 1-10. STIMULATING AN ELECTROMAGNETIC ATOM PAGE 16

FIGURE 1-11. ELECTRICAL PARTICLE GENERATOR PAGE 17 .

APPENDIX TO MEMO 418

LIST OF PHOTGRAPHS, FIGURES AND EXHIBITS

FIG. 26 EPG PRINCIPLE: ALLOWING A PERMANENTLY MAGNETIZED FLUID MEDIUM TO PASS THROUGH A PICKUP COIL FIG. 26 C: MULTI-TIER EPG ELECTRICAL GENERATOR

FIG. 27 EPG MECHANICAL DRIVE GAS ACCELERATOR

FIG. 28 EPG ELECTRICAL MAGNETIC GAS ACCELERATOR

FIG. 29 EPG PHOTON DRIVE GAS ACCELERATOR

FIG. 30 LINEAR GAS COIL ACCELERATOR

PHOTO EXHIBIT ZX: EPG MECHANICAL DRIVE ASSEMBLY

PHOTO EXHIBIT ZY: EPG ELECTROMAGNETIC PUMP ASSEMBLY

PHOTO EXHIBIT ZB: MAGNETIC SPIN GENERATOR

PHOTO EXHIBIT JX: GAS RESONANT CAVITY ASSEMBLY

MAKING MOLECULES*

POLAR MOLECULES*

METAL CONNECTIONS*

ELECTRONS: PARTICLES OF POWER*

ATTRACTION OF OPPOSITES*

NOTES: In the original document some pages were out of order and several figures inadvertently included twice.

The appropriate corrections were made in this edition with duplicate pages deleted and pages placed in the proper order.

*Also found in other Stan Meyer publications.

Above is a photo of one of Stanley's EPG system.

The EPG system or Electrical Particle Generator is basically a particle accelerator.

The EPG system is something that Stan was working on along with the Water Fuel Cell technology. It is suppose to be able to amplify the incoming signal/power to a much greater amperage / voltage.

It seems that not many people know that Stan was even working on this system. I have been doing extensive research and development on this system.

Some Important Notes from alot of study

After Studying Searl Magnetic SEG 2 things seam very apparent and possible with Stand machines

I call these Introvert (Stans Way) and extrovert.( electrons from our side tube)

Introvert

1a

The Stan Meyer Invert Method his stated method of having a magnetic gas move through tube,

could in fact be improved by have sensitive fer rite pickup inside the tube to make the voltage spikes, further enhancing stand magnetic stimulation of coils on outside of tube. Some of this was thought of as Searl Using the Gathering and Damming of electron using ferit in his system.

1b

it could also extract elections from gas inside tube which is not necessary;y same as Stan methods

similar to a Magnetic Flow Meter which would increase sensitivity of a could pickup or magnetic movement of a pick up coil, ( as there seam to be some debate about the copper preventing the magnetic gas making flux in pick up coils coil.

Extrovert

It seams pulsing gas with LED Laser will cause lithium oxygen and h2 to cool and become magnetic.

Also of Large Turbine use pure h2 to cool the machines ,gas flows through and cool the steel

some run the gas through the stators.

it is total possible that h2 or Magnetic gas compose could impart more electrons into the stator by attracting electron from air.

And Such the Epg Stans Unit will get vert cold when gas flowing as a rate of speed through it

it will in fact attract electron from air these could be harvested just like searl did. As the Ionising and air will flow to centre of egp.

Further pulsing with laser will increase the effect

Reference

# Scientists Create First Ever Magnetic Gas

By Stuart Fox September 18, 2009

https://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2009-09/scientists-create-first-ever-magnetic-gas

Article Clipping

For decades, scientists have debated whether or not gasses could display the same magnetic properties

as solids. Now, thanks to some MIT scientists, they know the answer is a freezing cold yes.

MIT researchers have observed magnetism in an atomic gas of lithium cooled down to 150 millionths

of a degree above absolute zero. This experiment represents a point of unification between condensed

matter research and the field of atomic science and lasers, and could influence areas such as data storage

and medical diagnostics.

To get the lithium gas so cold, the researchers trained an infrared laser beam on the gaseous cloud.

Laser cooling is the primary method physicists use to lower gas temperatures to near absolute zero.

The laser essentially stun the atoms, slowing them down, and thus lowering the temperature.

After initially growing, the cloud began to shrink. That shrinkage, combined with the speed of

expansion after the laser turned off, indicated that the lithium atoms had become magnetic.

"It's very important from an overall theoretical point of view because it gives us an understanding

of magnetism at its smallest possible scale," Scott Pritchard, an MIT professor, and one of

the experiment leaders, told us.

###### Improving magnetic gas directions or coil sensitivity

###### Backup of Video

###### Russ Made this Unit 2012

###### to try and study it design and use he never got it working we can learn from it

#### This is my Copper EPG i will be using for testing. The wire will be installed next, at a bare minimum there will be close to 2 miles of AWG22 magnet wire on this EPG.

#### You can see my first attempt at the EPG using plastic at the end of this page.

#### Here is some of the progress i have made. The divider plates are installed, next i start the wire winding.

#### I'm building a wire winder (the wood in the background ) to help wind the 2+ miles of wire... thanks to YouTube user hawk491000 for the idea on the winder!

####

### Update Photo Here: as of 2-8-12

##### Stanley A Meyer Mechanical Pump EPG coil parameters

LENGTH

Method 1.

The diameter of the outermost EPG channel or loop can be estimated.at about 17 inches

Therefore the outer circumference can be estimated at 17 x Pi inches

By dividing the circumference by the observed number of coils an estimated length of each coil can be made.

A further refinement in precision can be made by subtraction of the total length L occupied by coil spacers.

So in the case where you count, let's say as way of example, 59 coils and 60 coil end spacers, each winding is

1/59th of the circumference of 53.4 inches or calculated at about 0.905 inches long.

Method 2.

Because of the high resolution photographs available, estimates of a coil can be made directly.

Using a known measurement such as the outside diameter of tubing ie. 0.500 inches

in conjunction with a screen distance tool in Photoshop(r) or another program such as

Screen Caliper(r) the length of the coil can be made.

THICKNESS

Since the outside diameter of the core channel is known, an estimate of the thickness of depth of winding

may be obtained by using photogrammetry to estimate the thickness of the winding.

The total thickness or height of the wound coil is first measured. Then the core diameter is then subtracted.

the resulting figure is then divided by two. This is the height or thickness of the winding around the core

So now we have what is call a winding window with height H and length L.

H TIMES L = A the area of the winding window. Think of it a a cross-sectional view of

the coil windings with the ends of each wire being viewed.

Something like this:

IIOOOOOOOOOOOOII

IIOOOOOOOOOOOOII

IIOOOOOOOOOOOOII

representing 3 layers of wire with 12 wraps (the II symbolizing the coil dividers)

3 layers of wire by 12 wires wide or 36 turns or wraps of wire around a bobbin

IIooooooooooooooooooII

IIooooooooooooooooooII

HooooooooooooooooooII

In this exsmple, a thinner wire could be wound 18 times on the same length of bobbin.

NUMBER OF WINDS

Since the gauge of the wire can be estimated with a good amount of precision

,the use of circle packing theory (see wiki) theory can be used to determine the

number of turns that can fit through this winding window( Area equals Height

times length.

One factor that helps, is that wires come in standard thicknesses or diameters

For convenience the AWG (American Wire Gauge) is used in electrical

and electronic work, Electrical wiring in the U.S. is often 10,12 or 14AWG

Electronic work is often uses 18,22, or 30 AWG gauge wire

Whatever the reason the smaller the AWG number, the thicker or larger

the diameter of wire!!

The reason this helps in photogrammetry, is that the gauges are discrete values

Look at this table:

AWG Diameter in inches AWG Diameter in Inches

10 .1019 20 .0320

12 .0808 22 .0253

14 .0641 24 .0201

16 .0508 26 .0159

18 .0403 28 .0126

30 .0101

The 16 gauge wire is about 25% thicker than 18 gauge

The 22 gauge wire is about 25% thicker than 24 gauge

Not to get too technical, but this is a logarithmic scale, but the important concept

is the PERCENTAGE OF DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GAUGES IS LARGE

in relation to the precision achievable in photogrammetry

This means for a given photogrammetric distance is it easier to pick out the exact

gauge of wire used because the precision of the that method is often less than 2 to 5%.

PACKING FRACTION

There is a branch of mathematics which describes how many circles of uniform

size can be drawn in a given area. It goes by several names but let's just call it

Circle Packing Theory.

By determining the winding window size, the appropriate circle packing fraction can be used to

determine a close estimate of the number of windings per coil. In the previous example

cross-section of a coil, it represents one type of winding

Another type is hexagonal winding, with the layers arranged more like a honeycomb

And thirdly there is a random type of winding with lots of crossover and gaps

The hexagonal packing is the closest or most densest method of winding coils

with a value of 0.906 or about 91% of the area occupied by wire with the

balance of the area being gaps between the wires

Square geometry winding with each winding of wire directly on top the

layer below( No offset) has a value of 0.785 It is not at close or dense

a winding as hexagonal winding

A random wind often a more gaps but the packing ratio is highly dependent

on the size of the wire relative the length and width of the winding window

Consider for a moment two equally sized sheets of sandpaper.

One is coated coarse grade grit, the other coated coated with a fine grit used for

final sanding. The arrangement of the sand grains is random in both

cases but there are fewer grain of sand on the coarse paper and

many more grains of sand on the finer grit paper.

This is analogous to the number of random winding or wraps of wire in a given

cross sectional area on a bobbin. Intuitively very small wire gauges have a

higher packing fraction than large. This is a difficult value to quantify

SO IN SOME CASES IT MAY BE POSSIBLE TO CALCULATE THE NUMBER OF TURNS

IN SOME CASES EMPIRCAL METHODS OR TEST WINDINGS MIGHT BE NECESSARY

As an example if the winding window is 1 square inch and the AWG is 22, and the tighter hexagonal

winding factor is used(0.906) then 0.906 square inches of that window is occupied by the area of the wire..

The cross-sectional area of AWG 22 is 0.0005 inches.

0.906/divided by 0.0005 =approx 1800 turns

With precision or square winding a factor of 0.78 can be used resulting in an estimate of 1560 turns through

a 1 inch square window

SUMMARY

Basically the application of the above method may be used to estimate the number

of windings for an EPG coil by photogrammetric means in some cases

As search of empircal transformer design charts might be instructive for this third case

MISCELLANEOUS COMMENT

POWER OUTPUT DEPENDS ON METHOD OF WIRING PICKUP COILS

It appears as though the mechanical drive epg was wired in parallel lower voltage and and a

higher amperage due to more coils

While the multitier EPG was higher voltage due to fewer coils and many windings which required of multiple tiers

It also could be that the effective value of the flux in the mag-gas systems was lower that the higher density ferro fluids

which might explain the need to operate at 90 ips velocity

###### Russ Epg Build Attempt

The Picture Below show the end game System Stan Made

Top is a HCAT hho no flame can be turned to heat and water video to right

heat can further go to boiler or steam turbine

A0201-01 Thanks sandia24 . Nice work

A0201-03 I was setting up the variable list for Problem 4 on the power output ad input see if this is reasonable--Q's on

clarification or suggestions to team drop box or pm if your are an ionizationx member

_________________________________________________ _________________________________________________ ________________________

MAIN DISCUSSION FOLLOWS BELOW

VARIABLE LIST AND VALUE RANGE

VARIABLE VALUE SOURCE/// REFERENCE

V1 = velocity of magnetic field movement per second 50-90 ips In 2019 Handout in Bremen Conference

N1 = number of twists per unit length of non-magnetic spiral divider per unit length 0.3 - 1.2 Estimate for M4steel considering thickness

and core diameter.

N3 = value of magnetic field strength ? TBD by calc. and type of EPG

F1 = value of the frequency pulsing alignment coils for dyne-axis of magnetic field 60 Hz/sec Mains frequency in US 50 some parts of EU--- wiki

N4= number of coils per tier 1 - 58 Don Gabel, photogrammetry and SEPG022,

N5 = number of turns in each coil 200 - 12000 Estimates using packing fractions, winding depth,

length photogrammetry as secondary verification

P1 = effective cross-section winding factor: random, hexagonal or precision winding 0.78- 0.906 Wiki refs circle packing theory

N6 = number of core sectors enclosed by pick-up coil 3- 4 Don Gabel images of various EPG's

N7= number of tiers 1 - 7 Birth of New Technology 1994 or 1995 ed

A1= cross-sectional area of tubing uses in EPG tier ( in inches0 0.218- 0.254 The Copper Handbook

Power Input Variables

)

W1 = watts required for initiation of flow ( Initial inertial load) Rheological, mass density and volume consideration TBC

W2= steady state power load for mag-media circulation see appendix TBC

W3 = dyne-axis load see appendix TBC

Known values

N1 known

N2 known

N3 calculation to be completed

N4 known

N5 known

N6 known

F1 known

P1 known

V1 known

Stated design output was 220 VAC @ 300 amps ( per seminar notes)

A0202-01 Let's try another attempt at N3. At one of the conferences in 2019 ( SMC 2019 Bremen Ohio), it was proposed that the Transformer EMF

equation might be used in the mathematical model of the Meyer EPG series regarding the flux density problem.

Through photogrammetry the maximum number of turns , number of coils, diameter and volume of the core

magnetized slurry/gas can be determined. Since the output power, velocity, and frequency are known with some precision

It may be possible to arrange the transformer EMF equation to obtain a Beta Max for the flux density!!

Another observation was made at the 2019 Bremen Conference that the larger the core volume, the lower value of the magnetic

saturation could be and still maintain the same power output. This is because the total power output for the device is dependent

in part upon the total amount of flux present in the magnetic core.

A0202-02 Correct, if the other design factors such as the number of coils, number of winds and same velocity of the magnetic

gas or slurry are maintained, the limitations of the maximum level of magnetic saturation of the EFH series ferrofluids

can be mitigated. Basically scale up the volume and the magnetic saturation can be lower and still provide the

design power output. While the 400 Hz mil-spec converters are still an option for the magnetic drives I think

you may want to just keep it simple so that operating frequency matches the 50 or 60 Hz standards for output for

residential use.

A0202-03 thnx to thorzpwr

A0203=01 ok, you forgot to hide your location ,metadata I'll fix it zo the mib's don't get ya....lol

A0205-01 Since output data is only available for the 6Tmaggas EPG and for the velocity of the magnetic medium, 'I think a problem approach might be

to determine the flux in the 6 multi-tier system as if EFH-1 was present and then scale down to the magnetic pump system and volume of EFH-1

at the stated velocity and use a ,calculated flux density to determine output characteristics of the magnetic pump device in terms of output.

The sizing of the bus bars, the parallel arrangement of the pick-up coils and the breakdown voltage of the insulation might put some upper

limits to how it was being operated and limits to the possible voltagexs and amps produced

Design output 220 VAC at 300 amps = 66,000 watts

A020601 So now let's assign values to some of the variables

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cross sectional area is calculated as follows:

1. determine the diameter of the tubing 0.5" obtained by photogrammetry 0.5 outside diameter

also confirmed by actual measurement by Don Gabel . (see notebook photos)

2. determine the range of. possible internal diameters Common types of pipe K L and M that have the

same outside diameter but thickness of inner diameter and wall thickness vary.

Stan Meyer may have used pre-coiled air conditioning or water supply tubing. for ease of construction.

A very useful free reference is The Copper Tubing Handbook fermi which provides the specifications and measurements

for copper tubing and pipe.

You can google The Copper Tubing Handbook for the pdf or just click on this link:

https://pbar.fnal.gov/organizationalchart/Leveling/2004%20water%20cage%20work/Cutubehandbook.pdf

One observation concerning the publicly available EPG images, it that there do not seem to be joints on the spiralled sections

themselves although the connecting copper pipes to the pumps or other means of moving the slurry or gas are straight.

I believe Stan Meyerswas practical and tried to keep things simple, so I believe he just used piping that was already coiled when purchased.

So, now let's use the above reference to get a range of possible values for the cross-sections of the copper tubing and pipes

commonly available.. Copper pipe has three basic wall thicknesses: Type K, Type L and Type M So even though the outside

diameter may remain the same, a THICKER wall means a SMALLER cross-section inside the tube

So here's the values of cross-sectional area for different copper tubing and pipe in square inches:

Type K 0.218 Type L 0.233 Type M 0.254 So the cross-sectional area for coiled copper pipe is between 0.218 and 0.254 square inches

Since the 6 tier system is not available for examination at this time, there is a degree of imprecision for the cross-sectional area value

Because the cross-sectional area is used in volume calculations and in the calculation of total magnetic flux for these systems, the estimates

of system performance depend upon the type of tubing used in the construction

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Length of tubing carrying magnetic slurry/gas

Since the EPGs are of a general circular design, the formula C = D x Pi or stated -- Circumference of a circle equals the

diameter of the circle multiplied by Pi (approximately 3.1416)

Now, if you are trying to find the total length of tubing used in an EPG which is a spiral, for example(In this case exactly

3 loops, then thinkof this as 3 circles each with a different diameter and circumference

The outer loop is longer than the middle loop which is in turn larger the the innermost ring of loop.

So roughly speaking, let's say you had an EPG like the Magnetic Drive (Red Pump) System and that by examination

or photogrammetryand it was determined that diameter was 17 inches.

If you are using 1/2 inch tubing in the construction, what would be the diameter of the middle loop?

The radius of the middle loop is moved in by 1/2 inch because of the width of the outer loop or to put it another

way, the diameter of the middle loop would be 16 inches measured across its outside By a similar reasoning, the innermost loop

is or about 15 inches in diameter.

So the length the spiral is approximately ( 15 + 16 + 17) times Pi. Now Stan Meyer for reasons of type of pump used (B-500 had input and output

connections at right angles)then some portions of the spiral had four loops instead of three so adjustments will have to be

made for this added length. The total length of is important because this is used in the calculations

for the Volume of gas or ferrofluid being used and also in the calculations for inductance and the number windings for the

coils as well as the length of wire required for making the windings

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Coils and length of wire need for project and per coil

End View "Tube" length

A formula for a single wind around a single circular core O diameter of wire times 1

1.A formula for multiple winds around a singular tubular core of length L O diameter of wire x N number of windings or wraps

2 A formula for multiple winds around two adjacent tubular cores of length L OO diameter of wire x N number of windings or wraps

.3 A formula for multiple winds around three adjacent tubular cores of length OOO diameter of wire x N number of windings or wraps

4 General Formula for multiple winds around multiple tubes OOOO... diameter of wire x N number of windings or wraps

So the length of the tube determines the total number of wraps possible independent of the number of adjacent tubes

(close wraps no spacing between wraps on tube

Formula Length of tube (think inductor core) equals the number of wraps times the width or diameter of the wire L= N times W or L/ divided by W = N

ay of determining the number of wraps that can fit on a given length of tube or core

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now for the fun part determining the Length of Wire needed for one wrap around multiple adjacent cores

Formula for 1 core O L = Diameter of core times Pi

Formula for 2 adjacent cores OO L = (Diameter of core times Pi) PLUS 2D <--- for the wire that bridges the "notch" between the adjacent tubes (top and bottom)

Formula foe 3 adjacent cores OOO L = (Diameter of core times Pi) PLUS 4D <--- to account for the length needed to bridge 2 notches between the adjacent tubes (top and bottom)

Formula for 4 adjacent cores OOOO L = Diameter of core times Pi) PLUS 6D <--- To account for the length needed to bridge 3 notches between the adjacent tubes (top and bottom)

In summary, we now can calculate the length of a single wrap of wire around multiple adjacent cores and if we multiply that by the number of wraps or turns that can be wrapped on a given linear length of core

it is helpfun in deciding amount of wire needed

General Formula for Single Layer 1 wrap or turn around multiple adjacent tubes

L length equals ( Diameter of core or tube) plus ( ( N or number of cores minus 1) times 2)

So now is possible to calculate the number of winds or wraps (single layer0 around an EPG if we know the diameter of the outermost core of a spiralled EPG, the number of "loops" in the spiral, the outside

diameter of the core tubing and the gauge, diameter or width of the wire used to wrap the core

t

So lets give a quick try for the multitier 6TmaggasEPG

1 tier is about 17 inches in diameter. Since the line drawing of the 7 tier system and photographs show the drain/connecting tubes are 180 degrees apart so its possible to keep the number of loops for a tier to

be 2.5 3.5 or 4.5 loops or if the connecting tubes are all exact integers of loops the connecting tube could be all on one side. Or the direction of the flow could be counterclockwise one one tier and clockwise in the other tier. So based on the line drawing lets say that that each tier has 3.5 loops

Length of core for 1 tier [ ( 15+16+17)]times Pi ] plus( 1/2 times 14 times Pi) = 150.78 + 29.99 = 172.77 inches 6 tiers 1036 inches

172.77 inches divided by .025 inches per turn (22 gauge wire by photogrammetry = maximum 6910 turns per tier

6 times 6910 = 41,460 turns or if you use exactly 3 loops per tier 150.78 times 6 = 904 inches 904 divided by 0.025 = about 36,191 turns 6 tiers 906 inches

Image a n inductor with between 36 and 41 thousand turns of wire and between 75 and 86 feet long !! depending on method of construction

Design parameters Metric

The design output is 220 volts at 300 amp draw 66,000 watts (Watts)

(W) 220 times 300 amp draw = 66,000 watts

The cross-sectional area of the core is between 0.218 and 0.254 square in

or (A) = 1.406 to 1.634 sq cm or 0.0001406 0.0001634 square meters

F (frequency) is 60 cycle/ second AC

V (voltage) is 220 volts AC output

K Constant = 4.44

Solving of Bm =BetaMax

Basic equation

V = voltage

F = supply frequency

N = number of turns

A = cross sectional area in square meters

B = peak magnetic flux density in Weber / meter squared or T tesla

K = 4.44

V = 4.44 x F x N x A x B or rearranging this

B = divided by( 4.44 x f x N x a )

so let's try plugging in a few figures for a six tier device

V = voltage 220 VAC

F= 60 hertz per second in the US

N= 11,873

A = 0. 000468 sq m area 3 channels of pipe x 0.242 sq inches divided by conversion factor 1550 = 000468 square metres

4.44 = constant

Bmax = 220/ 1480 or 0.1486 Wb/M squared or Tesla for the 5/8" six tier system4.44 times F*N * BetaMax * A

Rearranging: BetaMax = V divided by ( 4.44 x F x N x A)

220 divided by( 4.44 times 60 Hz/sec frequency times 36191 x .218 A sq inches = .0001046

now to work on units. with a different diameter..

V = 220 VAC...

F = supply frequency

N = number of turns

A = cross sectional area in square meters

B = peak magnetic flux density in Wb / meter squared or T tesla

K = constant

V = 4.44 x F x N x A x Bmax, or rearranging this

Bmax = V divided by( 4.44 * F * N * A )

so let's try plugging in a few figures for a six tier device with a 5/8" OD copper spiral

V = voltage 220 VAC

F= 60 hertz per second in the U

N = 11,87

A = 0. 000468 sq m area 3 channels of pipe x 0.242 sq inches divided by conversion factor 1550 = 000468 square metres

B = BetaMax

K = 4.44 ( constant )

Thus Bmax = 220/ 1480 or 0.1486 Wb/M squared or Tesla for the 5/8" six tier system

[ b]Next Topic Multiple layer coils

In terms of construction if the cross sectional area is changed because of using a larger diameter tubing but keeping N number of turns the same and the length of the

spiralled coils is the same and other factors the same (same desired output) t because the output is related to the amount of flux of the core, the larger the core in terms

of cross section (and volume) means that a lower Beta value in the core of the upsized EPG can still result in the desired power output. Basically if more power is

needed the large core can allow for a lower amount of flux to be used if there is a limit to magnetic saturation for the slurry or mag-gas matrix.

This is more useful to calculate wire requirements for the Mechanical Pump EPG .

Since it's possible to estimate the thickness of the coils, the length of the original coils,

the gauge of the wire and velocity of the ferrofluid 50 ips and using a flux value estimate

a power output for the Mechanical Pump EPG.

##### Stanley A Meyer Useful Reference Books for EPG Design

« on: February 16, 2021, 16:58:44 pm »

Inductance Calculations by Frederick W Grover

Classical Electromagnetism by Jerrold Franklin

Solved Problems in Classical Magnetism by Jerrold Franklin

all published at one time or another by www.doverpublications.com

inductor calculator

https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/tools/coil-inductance-calculator/

link to EFH-1 permeability

https://www.elektr.polsl.pl/images/elektryka/229/229-2.pdf

p 18 mu = 1.789 for ferrotec EPH1

##### Stanley A Meyer Negative Viscosity of Ferrofluids and EPG Design Considerations

« on: February 21, 2021, 14:38:29 pm »

The ability of ferrofluids to exhibit negative viscosities has implications for the selection of ferrofluids

used in the Meyer mechanical drive EPG as well as the linear magnetic drive systems.

Although there are viscosity measurements provided by the manufacturer of the EFH series ferrofluids and

it was postulated that the selection of the EFH -1 over the then available EFH- 4 which had a greater viscosity

(but also a higher percent of magnetite and magnetic susceptibility) was primarily given a greater importance

then magnetic susceptibility as a design factor.

If ferrofluids have a lower viscosity under an alternating magnetic field this observation might allow the use of

higher viscosity ferrofluids than those used by Stanley A Meyer

A possible effect of the alignment coils in the mechanical pump EPG design may be to reduce the viscosity

of the ferrofluid before and after pumping. There are also implications for the velocity of gaseous magnetic

matrices in the multi-tier series of EPG which used linear magnetic pumps.

see attachment or internet search for "negative viscosity of ferrofluid under alternating magnetic field"

TY - JOUR

AU - Shliomis, Mark

AU - Morozov, Konstantin

PY - 1994/08/01

SP - 2855

EP - 2861

T1 - Negative viscosity of ferrofluid under alternating magnetic field

VL - 6

DO - 10.1063/1.868108

JO - Physics of Fluids - PHYS FLUIDS

ER -

##### Stanley A Meyer EPG and Manufacture of Paramagnetic Slurries

« on: March 04, 2021, 01:51:44 am »

A previous post detailed a possible process for the manufacture of ferro argonide dust or powders to be circulated in

the electrical particle generated with the circular or spiraled channel of the devices

Ferro-Tec, a major supplier of ferrofluids to the world sells dry magnetite powders. It might be possible to mix these with

low viscosity carrier fluids perhaps a thin silane ,or mineral oil to create a slurry with high magnetic saturation

with viscosity appropriate for the mechanical pump and linear magnetic drive series of EPGs

The new polyethylene glycol PEG ferrofluids have very low viscosity but are aqueous in nature

Other dry powders are available with various for coatings which might allow a variety of optimum liquid carriers.

Not all of the early EPG models of Stanley Meyer's devices used mechanical pumps to move

magnetic slurry or gas within the copper spiral cores. One model used linear magnetic drive

pumps to circulate the slurry/gases. The other was the magnetic spin EPG. The six tier multiple

tier EPG (aka "gega series" or (6Tmaggasepg) designed for home power generation also had

similar pumps. The seven tier system is now thought to have had a bottom tier with electronics

for control of the flow of the magnetic gas but not pickup coils. The library group has located

documentation by people who either saw the device or saw an arkived video recording of it

powering a row of incandescent bulbs

see attached 3 new images of the EPGs and a linear pump cross-section

Photo Label Source

1 Mechanical Drive EPG Stanley Meyer Arkive (c)

2 Magnetic Drive EPG Stanley Meyer Arkive (c)

3 Example Linear Mag Drive Wiki

The 7Tier maggas EPG had a plywood base and row of 6 incandescent. bulbs.

After Stan's passing this was not present in the inventory that QCI ultimately acquired

Also it was not present at the L3 unit when the TOP assessment was made.

###### But Which Gas?

###### I think helium is a good choice. I looked up Helium 3 which is used with MRI machines to scan the inside of lung passage ways. He3 has magnetic properties that can be viewed on the MRI machine.

######

###### ote the similarity to what Haisch and Moddel did with a Casimir cavity and a noble gas...

https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/8-05-quantum-physics-ii-fall-2013/lecture-notes/MIT8_05F13_Chap_07.pdf#page=13

###### BACK UP DOCUMENT

######

One can use a voltage gradient to separate the two states of ammonia (N-Up, N-Down), pump the N-Up into a resonant cavity, then feed that resonant cavity with 23.87 GHz to force the N-Up ammonia molecules to relax to their ground state, giving off microwave photons in the process. The energy given off is in resonance with the 23.87 GHz pump. https://www.kenwood.com/i/products/info/amateur/ts50s.html

Since ammonia will naturally be a mixture of N-Up and N-Down, given time, the 'relaxed' ammonia when released from the resonant cavity will regain the normal proportion of N-Up and N-Down due to random thermal fluctuations forcing some of the ammonia molecules back into an N-Up state. Rinse and repeat.

This is the basis for a MASER (Microwave Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation).

Could this have been what Stan Meyer was doing with his "magnetic gas", using the microwaves to dissociate water?

######

###### Fascinating!

I seem to remember that the exhaust of his buggy was reported as foul smelling, ammonia. Would he only exhaust it after an extraction cycle? Is there enough to be extracted? From what I understood before, the water (or it's components) from the fuel tank was somehow made to react with intake air, the nitrogen finding it's way to the NH3 ammonia exhaust fumes. If there is some serious energy left in the form of ammonia obtained this way, one can expect Stan to have extracted it.

Stan's work is very compelling, way above my comprehension. I hope someone figures it out, or takes a part of the work and gets it to stand by itself.

######

###### US2780069 Precession.pdf -

###### Back up Doc

######

######

######

##### Stanley A Meyer EPG and Stable Room Temperature Magnetic Liquid Compounds

« on: March 21, 2021, 16:12:07 pm

Stanley A Meyer is said to have designed EPG devices that circulated magnetic gases and liquids

To date, the creation of magnetic gas matrices has proven challenging to the various EPG researchers

and working groups . While the EPG design and concepts have been fairly well elucidated by Miner,

Greis, and Hauswirth, et al,' the use of stable magnetic compounds that are single entity liquids may open

up a novel method of electrical generation in the liquid EPG systems.

"Hamaguchi et al. observed magnetic ionic liquids by introducing FeCl4 to the anion part to form

1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrachloroferrate, (Bmim)FeCl4.1,2) A magnetic fluid is a liquid with

magnetic properties. However, a conventional magnetic fluid contains volatile solvents. It causes a

change of viscosity and phase separation by cohesion/precipitation. On the other hand, the magnetic

ionic liquid is a highly stable and non-volatile liquid. Moreover, this magnetic ionic

liquid responds to a magnetic field by a permanent magnet, because it shows large magnetic

susceptibility at room temperature."

The magnetic susceptibility can be further increased by the addition of nano-particles in the 10 to 100 size range

that are used in the ferrofluid technologies. In this situation the carrier fluid has a magnetic component to it as

well as the particles in suspension. The kerosene based ferro-fluids such EFH and EMG series Ferrotech(r)

would be good choice for the Series 6 trial The ionic/aqueous ferrofluids will be addressed in Series 7 trials

source diagrams and chemicals

https://www.tcichemicals.com/US/en/c/12839�

# Magnetic Ionic Liquids

Ionic liquids consist of only ionic components, having high ionic conductivity suitable for a liquid electrolyte. An electrolyte for a secondary battery requires not only high ionic conductivity but also non-volatility, heat-resistivity, non-inflammability, and non-corrosiveness. Ionic liquids cover these conditions. The cationic component of ionic liquid involves alkyl-substituted imidazolium, pyrrolidinium, piperidinium, ammonium, phosphonium, sulfonium and the anionic component involves halide, BF4, PF6, thiocyanate, and di(sulfonyl)imide. Chemical modifications of the cation and anion control melting point, viscosity and ionic conductivity. Hamaguchi et al. observed magnetic ionic liquids by introducing FeCl4 to the anion part to form 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrachloroferrate, (Bmim)FeCl4.1,2) A magnetic fluid is a liquid with magnetic properties. However, a conventional magnetic fluid contains volatile solvents. It causes a change of viscosity and phase separation by cohesion/precipitation. On the other hand, the magnetic ionic liquid is a highly stable and non-volatile liquid. Moreover, this magnetic ionic liquid responds to a magnetic field by a permanent magnet, because it shows large magnetic susceptibility at room temperature.

Attached is a representation of a Nickel Argonide (NiAr) gas matrix based on

the FeAr gas matrix shown in the Meyer New Zealand video and also the CoAr

it's interesting that Meyer shows (in a 2d representation) iron and argon sharing 4 electrons

The argon +1 ion can be achieved by high voltage sparks in a rarified argon gas

Additional "laser" excitement might allow more atoms in the outer shell to

leave the outer ring especially if in the presence of an electron extraction circuit

A number of factors make it easier to extract the electrons from the transitional

metals used partly because of a lower ionization energy due to the greater distance

of the outer electron shell from the positive nucleus and that there\are more available

electrons to be pulled off. I suspect that in a 3d configuration of the FeAr matrix

is similar to the cubic orthography of NaCl. However the stability of the FeAr matrix

may be enhanced by the stabilizing forces due to the paramagnetism of FE Co or Ni

This is in addition to the ionic bonding force qq

The gas may be more of a nanocluster light enough to be carried by the Argon

carrier gas analogous to sand in water or quicksand 3 to 20 FeAr per clump